We’ve Been Bamboozled by Software Licences


If you purchase a software product, you are entitled to do a lot more than what Microsoft would like you to. Their "End User Licence Agreement" or EULA, says you're not allowed to reverse engineer the software, modify it etc, but under most legal codes this is not enforacble as it is not backed up by law.

In the United States, once you own a copy of a program, you can back it up, compile it, run it, and even modify it as necessary, without permission from the copyright holder.

Microsoft puts a “license” on all of its software and pretends that you don’t have the right to use the software unless you agree to the “license.” You can’t patch Windows without their permission, according to the license; you can’t use NT Workstation for more than 10 simultaneous connections; you must give Microsoft your first-born son. (Or something like that.)

The problem with Microsoft’s license is that it’s unenforceable. You can simply ignore it. Microsoft can’t win a copyright infringement lawsuit: you own the software that Microsoft sold you, and Congress gave you the right to use it.

Fascinating! Apparently the European Union also has a similar legal situation:

The European Software Directive (adopted by the UK in 1992) gives users the freedom to copy, run, modify, and reverse-engineer lawfully acquired programs.

Be interesting to see where Australia and Singapore / ASEAN fit into this.

Software user's rights on cr.yp.to

Author bio and support


Ruben Schade is a technical writer and infrastructure architect in Sydney, Australia who refers to himself in the third person. Hi!

The site is powered by Hugo, FreeBSD, and OpenZFS on OrionVM, everyone’s favourite bespoke cloud infrastructure provider.

If you found this post helpful or entertaining, you can shout me a coffee or send a comment. Thanks ☺️.