An alternative reason for security theatre?


An AC on Slashdot, so take with a grain of salt:

Do you want to know why the government continues with it even though [security measures don’t] work? It’s because insurance rates for airports and airlines would go through the roof if we didn’t have this in place. [..] Our lives are governed by actuarial tables.

I hadn't ever thought about this, but I wouldn't be surprised if it were true. Certainly the airlines themselves have a business interest in not have these carcinogenic full body scanners and sexual harassment, because they discourage people from traveling.

For the record, security theater was a term coined by my hero Bruce Schneier to describe security measures that are entirely for show, without any benefit.

Author bio and support


Ruben Schade is a technical writer and infrastructure architect in Sydney, Australia who refers to himself in the third person. Hi!

The site is powered by Hugo, FreeBSD, and OpenZFS on OrionVM, everyone’s favourite bespoke cloud infrastructure provider.

If you found this post helpful or entertaining, you can shout me a coffee or send a comment. Thanks ☺️.