There he goes about high speed rail again

Thoughts

What could possibly go wrong?

Extra fuel is joining peanuts and magazines on the list of things American Airlines wants to ditch at the gate. The airline announced plans this week to save cash by using “scientifically precise” computer models to load less fuel. If pilots want more, they’ll need to submit a request in writing.

I would think retiring the world's largest fleet of ageing MD-80 would do more to reduce fuel consumption than these penny pinching schemes. They still call 1c coins pennies in the US, right? I found an Aussie penny in a drawer yesterday from before decimalisation. It had King George The Something on it.

Back to this flight nonsense, it's almost as if they have an ulterior motive with these decisions… say for example being able to land earlier than other planes in holding patterns above airports because they're running out of fuel sooner, or so they can pretend to appeal to greenies while saving themselves a few bucks, or so they can blame pilots for more problems. "Hey it's not our fault for that, the pilot didn't fill out form 23A…"

I’ve got an even better idea

Anyway I've got an even better idea (you just said that Ruben) to reduce fuel consumption in places like the US and Australia: ditch domestic flights altogether and replace them with cross-continent high speed rail! They'd be more comfortable, more convenient, vast airport land could be reclaimed for parks and other such Hippie draws, and best of all we could wire them up to renewable energy sources like geothermal for baseload and solar in the centre where very little rain falls. It's genius, I tell you!

Hey, I can dream, right?

Photo of an American Airlines MD80 being deiced by PhilipC on Flickr.


Format 720K floppy disk in Windows XP

Thoughts

Helping my dad today with some old disks, we realised that in XP Microsoft removed the 720K option from the GUI format tool, and the /F:720 flag is gone from FORMAT on the command line! Fortunately if you specify the tracks and sectors manually it recognises the 720K disk and formats it.

FORMAT A: /T:80 /N:9

I don't have any machines with floppy drives running Vista or 7, but I assume this still works in later versions.


Indie media in the Czech Republic?

Media

In [the] Czech Republic you actually have to pay OSA (they collect money for music usage) if you want to publish your own work (they actually claim that they will return you 70% of that if you sign with them).

Does anyone know if this is true? If it is, I wonder how many Czech internet users are breaking the law with their podcasts? Another case of technology always being two [hundred] steps ahead of the law.

My dad, sis and I went to Plzeň in the Czech Republic in January. Some really beautiful old buildings and great food. Good thing I didn't attempt to publish any of the audio I recorded while I was there!


One sided reporting on Android and the iPhone

Hardware

Creepy Android logo.

While I'm ragging on Android and on my mobile soapbox thingy, why is it the media consistently gives the platform a free ride but criticises everything Apple does?

It’s not just old media

Don't get me wrong, I adore Slashdot and still use it as a primary news source in lieu of sites like Reddit and Digg, but their double standards are so breathtaking I fear sometimes I may collapse from a lack of oxygen. I hope I'm not near anything pointy when that happens, I don't think my insurance covers such stuff.

Yesterday's story that was summarised as the sweet eye candy of Android was only one of a litany of examples. I imagined that if Android had been substituted with iOS, the story would probably have been tagged as flamebait and plenty of angry people would have been frantically typing on their keyboard explaining why Apple is the spawn of Satan.

The latest example is this serious security hole in Android that wasn't even accidental but was deliberately designed.

Google Has Android Remote App Install Power, Too
It turns out that Android also includes a feature that enables Google to remotely install apps on users’ phones as well.

BlueBoxSW humorously pointed out that had the story been about the iPhone, the headline would have read:

“Evil Apple Hides Secret Rootkit Installer on All iPhones”

Standards

I think the reason for such one sided reporting is people hold Apple to such higher standards than everyone else. If Apple had released a Google Nexus One like device people would have been screaming bloody murder that they couldn't read the OLED screen outside, or if it were an EVO there would have been thousands of detailed stories about how the battery barely lasts a few hours and that CDMA 4G takes half an hour to connect.

Because the aforementioned devices don't have an Apple badge, it's as if people are somewhat more willing to live with the flaws so they can pretend to be running these entirely open phones with their locked in, proprietary, crash prone Flash players and backdoors to allow a commercial company to install things without the user's knowledge.

Again none of this should be construed to mean I wouldn't want an Android device myself (once they make some decent hardware and stop blaming it for software problems as I blogged about last year), and I certainly am not suggesting we let our guard down on Apple, but come on folks the stench of hypocrisy is threatening to gas us all.

The other players

I tell you what though, one thing we can all agree on is how amazing it is Microsoft has been so quickly and effectively sidelined with all their silly Kin and Windows Mobile Enterprise Phone Corporate Service Pack One Edition whatnot. The entire debate is framed as Apple versus Google, Microsoft barely even gets a mention in footnotes any more. Except for this post, hey at least I'm doing my bit. Buy a Sidekick!!!


Android is Cheerios, not sweet eye candy

Software

Imagine the uproar on Slashdot if this story description was posted about an Apple product! But I digress.

According to Liliputing, Intel is bringing the sweet eye candy of Android to x86, which — if all goes well — means it will land on (more) netbooks and tablets soon.

There are certainly many legitimate reasons people could give for running Android, including having access to [some of] the source code and [somewhat] greater freedom over what you can do with the hardware, but its UI is hardly one of them and it certainly isn't "sweet eye candy".

I'd describe the Android UI with the same word the Metacity team uses to describe their window manager: Cheerios. Not terribly attractive or tasty, but it gets the job done and probably won't shatter like an iPhone 4. HTC's Sense UI may be Slightly Frosted Cheerios. Can you get Slightly Frosted Cheerios?

Let's not forget the prototype Andoid devices were originally designed to broadly copy the BlackBerry UI, it was only when Apple breathed new life into the fairly stagnant smartphone market (thank you, Windows Mobile :P) that Android started looking like… an iPhone. Nothing really wrong with that, but when you have so many other compelling features you should promote them instead.

While I’m on my soapbox…

While I'm ragging on Android and on my mobile soapbox thingy, why is it the media consistently gives the platform a free ride but criticises everything Apple does? It's not just old media, sites like Slashdot are so


Throwing away our childhoods

Thoughts

Yes, that's a photo I took of my dad in our rental car with a giant soft toy rhino head! I had that on my bedroom wall since I was a little kid, now we're getting rid of him.

I'm under no illusion that I wasn't extraordinarily lucky to be an expat kid. Most people don't get the opportunity to live overseas, let alone go to school and make friends somewhere else and its an experience I'll carry with me the rest of my life, provided that gypsy was bluffing and I won't be hit by a bus that'll cause retrograde amnesia. In my case, I also learned I preferred living in Singapore to my home country which I may never have realised unless I'd made the trip.

I belabour all this nonsense to put into context my one gripe with growing up as an expat kid, besides not being able to get a reliable source of Tim Tams and having people laugh at me when I say I wear thongs: my childhood isn't in any real tangible form.

What do I mean by that?

Ugh, I hate rhetorial questions, and it's worse when I ask them myself. But I digress; Buddhists and anti-materialists would scoff at such a notion, but to me possessions are tangible proof of our past. Rooms full of stuff are like mini, personalised museums about us. Soft toys we cuddled until they were threadbare, our first love letters (or in my case the first "I really like you" letters I wrote and got rude replies from :P), mugs from weird places, well read books with worn spines, my first computer, posters from old National Geographic magazines with stickers on them, and so on.

I know it sounds shallow and certainly it's not politically correct to admit you love possessions, but I do love some, even if they are useless or have nothing but sentimental value. I'm also a terrible hoarder, but that's for another off-topic post.

Bedrooms and toys and all that

I often hear about people going to visit their parents and how thrilled they are to see their old bedrooms with all the stuff they grew up with and am so jealous I want to make a thick banana milkshake to drown my petty sorrows. Banana in any sort of milkshake is good because it makes it taste creamier without any extra fat. But I digress, again.

Given we moved so many times growing up, any toys or moments both my sister and I had that were deemed even slightly too young for us were thrown away to save costs, or barring that put into a self storage locker.

I'm too tired and couldn't be bothered making one of my classic nostalgia montages, so I'll just add this one from an older post. Some of it has nothing to do with physical possessions, but you get the idea!

90s nostalgia!

Hoping we don’t regret all this

With this latest cleanout we've had to be even more ruthless; entire boxes of children's books, train sets, soft toys and all other aspects of our past have been resealed and sent to charities or recycling centres, and the storage locker which acted like a time capsule was completely emptied and its contents thrown away.

We've saved a small fortune doing this so studiously over the last few weeks, but at the same time I feel sad that we've been so successful at erasing our childhoods. I admit on more than a few occasions I've loved cracking open the Lego boxes and making ridiculous contraptions, or re-reading old fairy tales my mum used to read to me every night before she got sick, or watching Sailor Moon, or playing Magic cards.

Finding old Pokemon cards, Tamagotchis, yoyos, marbles, Tazos and all that… then dumping them. It's necessary, and I don't need any of it, but it still really, really sucks. The Buddhist answer to this would be that the desire for material possessions is causing such sadness. I suppose they're right.

One thing I've vehemently demanded though is that all the achingly beautiful paintings and tapestries my mum made me of stars and rainbows for my bedrooms over the years have been kept. One of these days when I'm a multi billionaire after patenting a new system to hide open zippers on pants to save embarrassment, I'll open a small art museum and put all her stuff in it. While most expat mums were buying their kids expensive toys and art for their rooms, our mum made things for us. She was amazing.

Oh yeah, and I still have my Little Bear and Old Bear soft toys :).


Australia has a female atheist PM! Run away!

Internet

Me in front of Parliament house in Canberra!

A case of another leader who started with a lot of promise but failed to deliver like so many other politicians, so they were replaced. Which of course is the politically correct way to say said person didn't fulfill the desires of some faction. So who do we have now?

Late last night a cabinet reshuffle ousting thingy (they're valid political terms, look them up) former Aussie Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has been replaced with Julia Gillard. No, that's me in front of Parliament House, not Julia Gillard, sheesh get your glasses checked.

Position on internet filtering?

Because this is a tech blog (or at least it's supposed to be) I'm more interested to hear what happens to Mr If You Are Against The Mandatory Filter You're A Pedophile Senator Conroy's position. My very good friend and all around awesome guy talkingduck informs me that he could be replaced by Kate Lundly, patron senator of IT and open source. Sounds great, almost too great, so I'm hedging my bets that it won't happen. I hope I'm wrong.

What I'd love to see is a person put in charge who not only recognises the need for open standards, but a transparent bidding process for government IT contracts and who understands that a mandatory internet filter is a futile exercise that will hurt Australia's standing in the world. Oh and it'd be great if she took the NBN seriously, and if she pledged to make all government documents open and available in standard formats, or if not her then someone she puts in charge. We'll have to wait and see.

Positions on other whatnot?

As for other issues, Kevin Rudd talked the talk when it came to asylum seekers, emissions trading and the environment, but failed to follow up on any of them. Preliminary chatter on Twitter by my Aussie friends suggests she won't be changing much of the party's policies, bummer. Ah democracy, its such a productive exercise.

One bit of good news is she's an atheist, like me. I have no problem with people of any faith being the leaders of countries provided they don't let their influence their policy decisions, and Tony Abbott and Kevin Rudd unabashedly proved they couldn't in that recent embarrassing debate. If anything only addressing Christian voters was an insult to people of all other faiths and not just heathens like me.

Not sure when the Governor General will be swearing her in on behalf of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and all that. I suppose in these circumstances I can see where having a separate head of state and head of government is a good thing, sort of, kinda, maybe.


A lesson in sheer packing stupidity

Thoughts

I almost lost my D60 and my favourite lens!!!

Once upon a time (or times, if you're into the whole dimensional vortex thing) there was a socially awkward and terribly anxious young man who did something so breathtakingly stupid he was called to co-author a book with a former Alaskan governor.

Picture if you will

His family were in the process of moving, so This Person was tasked one drizzly morning with moving several large boxes from one point to another; a laborious task made even more difficult by his piss-weak muscles and spindly construction.

To aid in his efforts, This Person decided to rearrange some of the boxes to average out their weight and make them easier to lift. Such a scheme turned out to work better than expected, and he was able to move said boxes without too much difficulty; this phrase being used in a relative sense.

Brace position, tray table up

This is where the breathtaking — nay jaw meet floor — stupid act was committed. Because This Person decided to take his SLR camera to take photos (they're much better at doing this than making sandwiches) he decided to spare himself a trip and put the camera in its bag into one of the boxes. His favourite NIKKOR AF-S 35mm f/1.8G lens was attached.

Over the course of the day boxes with were shifted and reorganised, with some being sent to winners of eBay auctions, others to libraries and orphanages for book donations, some to charities and the rest to recycling centres. A very efficient operation he could assure you.

When the evening was over This Person decided to attempt to locate his SLR and remembered to his horror that he'd left it in a box. But which one? And had that box been taken to a charity or a recycling centre? What if they'd already given it to a person who in good conscience he couldn't demand back? What if the recycling place had already crushed it along with other electronic goods assuming it was broken?

Adrenaline == ensured insomnia

He searched every box in the house. In THE LAST BOX, yes, THE LAST BOX in the loungeroom he found his SLR bag and the camera safely tucked inside.

This Person has learned a valuable lesson: let his sibling move boxes.


Ed Bott misses reason for Windows crapware

Software

Checking out ZDNet I was redirected to an article by Ed Bott who dismisses many of the woes with Windows as being the fault of its antitrust lawsuit. Yeah, damn those big government people trying to break up an unethical corporation!

It was 10 years ago this week that Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson issued his final judgment in U.S. versus Microsoft. Two months earlier, after almost two years of legal proceedings, the judge found that Microsoft had illegally abused its monopoly in the operating system market [..]

So, ten years later, with the gift of hindsight, how did that settlement work out? [..] Here are four significant developments that affect all PC users and in my opinion can be traced directly back to the antitrust case and its settlement.

Ed then proceeded to list a bunch of reasons why Windows is still terrible to use, but provided only tenuous reasons why they have anything to do with DOJ court decisions. Had he not mentioned the word "antitrust" in his report, it could have just been passed off as a critique of Windows in general, me thinks.

Crapware isn’t the fault of the free market! Oh, wait

While Ed delights in thanking the judge for all the crapware installed on Windows machines, he fails to point out the scourge existed long before Microsoft was deemed to have abused their monopoly, and he doesn't touch on the primary reason.

Unlike Apple which sells a cohesive and markably different product (which you may or may not like), hardware manufacturers were all selling the same Wintel whatnot and needed a way to differentiate themselves. Being clueless, this meant they bundled their own awful CD burning software, media players and rheems of nasty trialware, then replaced a base Windows install CD with a restore disc that meant you couldn't even wipe it clean with a fresh install. Of course, such manufacturers also get nice kickbacks from those software vendors for inconveniencing their users like that.

Pointless nostalgia moment: I remember my otherwise beautiful little Sony VAIO PictureBook machine in 2000 had so much crapware I saved half it's drive space by buying a retail copy of Windows 2000 and wiping Me and its crapware off it entirely. I couldn't run Red Hat Linux on it because it didn't detect the then-revolutionary webcam. Anyway I wouldn't touch a Sony product with a ten-foot pole now, not least because of their rootkit shenanigans and from this previous crapware experience.

QED sounds like an ocean liner

It's similar to what we're seeing with Android handset makers now; HTC's UI and bundled software are different from other Android makers simply so people are given motivation to buy their products over others. The result is a level of imposed fragmentation that simply doesn't exist on a products made by Apple (or the late Palm), nor the chosen fragmentation from a true FOSS system such a FreeBSD or your Linus distribution of choce where the users choose exactly what they want and not a third party. But that's for another post!

Anyway I'm just a anxious blogger who gets paid in donated cups of coffee, and Ed Bott has the following humble description added to each of his stories; and judging from some of the titles of his other recent articles you can tell he's not into sensationalism ;).


Links for 2010-06-17

Internet

Links shared from del.icio.us today:

(categories: advertising corruption censorship magazines)