Posts tagged with "spam"


Unsubscribing from StackExchange pandas

Sign that says Pandas

I hate the term, but starting in 2013 I decided to be more proactive about the emails I receive. With regards to newsletters, unless it provides information not available elsewhere through RSS, Twitter or the like, I unsubscribe. Synergising my inbox paradigms.

Having clicked the unsubscribe link in a StackExchange email, I was presented with the above image, and a comment.

We couldn't find the page you requested, but we did find this sign that might help.

While technically true, I doubt sicking a panda onto my inbox will rid me of your newsletters. That is, unless it somehow overcomes its bamboo addiction and begins ingesting them on my bearhalf.

Jokes aside, having unsubscribed to dozens of newsletters so far this year, errors like this are disturbingly common, regardless of the browser or platform I use. I suppose some sites figure if they make it non-trivial to unsubscrube, you'll just stick with them.


How many comments does it take to ruin a joke?

Mount Lofty Cafe in the Adelaide Hills

A few weeks ago, Georgina on Twitter gave me some moral support for disabling Rubenerd.com's comment system in June 2012. So far, so good!

Spam

When I first turned comments off, I stated the primary reason was spam. I was getting hundreds of spam messages a day, and the law of diminishing returns started kicking in. Sure, I could comb through these and perhaps uncover a legitimate comment, but the time it took to do so was increasingly hard to justify.

Details, details, details

I'll admit, that was only part of the story. In his typical style which I now miss dearly, John Siracusa pointed this out which rang bells:

The main point is that you're supposed to be communicating something, and if you successfully communicate that idea, it doesn't matter so much about how you said it. That's the details. It's better to be better at communication without being strictly correct or formal or whatever than the reverse when you're correct and formal but don't communicate your idea.

Someone in the real world professed to reading my blog once, but claimed what I wrote was often wrong. When quizzed about what they meant, it was because I'd often fail to mention certain details, or that my definitions weren't entirely accurate.

And therein lies the issue. Unless you define every term in legalese with hundreds of footnotes, caveats and painstakingly outlined definitions for what "security" and "is" means, there will always, ALWAYS be ways to pick apart posts. After a while, it became tiring arguing over tiny, insignificant points when the broader issues I was hoping to foster conversations about went ignored.

In Siracsa's words, I was communicating an idea, but rather than commenting on that, some people just revelled in being picky. More power to them, their choice! Another way to put it is this joke currently spreading:

How many geeks does it take to ruin a joke?

Okay, first of all you mean nerds, not geeks. And it's not a joke, it's a riddle. Proceed.

I have a bone to pick with your humerus

The third problem is humour. While I spent my formative years living in Asia, my mum was Scottish Australian and my dad is German. Both these cultures, much like the Brits where a large part of Aussie culture derives, value self deprecating, dry and deadpan senses of humour that are lost on some people. Chalk it up to cultural differences, but I'd say something I think is clearly a joke, and there'd be people who'd misunderstand or get offended.

This doesn't happen as much on App.net or Twitter, because people on those networks presumably follow me because they like what I tweet, my sense of humour makes sense to them, and I pay them large sums of money. In a blog, people often found my posts through search engines, would read a bit, misunderstand, get angry, and post away.

So the question I set out to answer in this post: was it a good idea to turn off blog comments? Most definitely. I've noticed a drastically improved quality of life since doing this, and I have no intention of re-enabling them any time soon. John Gruber and Dave Winer were onto something.

That said, I've decided to look into alternative ways to allow people to contact me for feedback, maybe a disposable email address with the year in it or something.

Photo by me, at a café in Mount Lofty in Adelaide.


People still fall for this Twitter DM spam?

Icon from the Tango Desktop Project

Yay, got some more spam DMs from cracked Twitter accounts this afternoon!

Hi this user is making really bad rumors about you [dodgy link redacted]

And one I haven't seen for a while.

lol...omg i am laughing so hard at this pic of me my friend uploaded [dodgy link redacted]

On the one hand I find it hard to believe anyone still falls for this stuff, but I guess they are if the spammers can still justify sending them out.


Goodbye blog comments!

Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam...

Given a spam filter of mine recently past the dubious 6 millionth spam comment filtered, I've decided to do the unthinkable and disable comments entirely. Here's my logic!

It didn't used to be this way Smithers...

Back in the bad old days of blogging, we didn't have comment systems. My first site was run off a simple Perl CGI script I wrote, but even as I moved to RapidWeaver I still didn't have blog comments. I got around the problem by running a Vanilla Forums install, and linking to my posts. It worked reasonably well.

When I moved to WordPress in 2005, I suddenly had blog comments. I liked that the barrier to entry was lower than a forum; users didn't need to register for an account to post a comment, so the upshot was more people left comments. Some posts I've written, such as font smoothing on Snow Leopard and the Canadian Hinton Train disaster have spawned entire discussions with disparate people around the world.

Like so many technologies though, it didn't take the douchebags long to realise they could wreck it for the rest of us. I can't tell exactly when it started getting out of control, but in the last few years the amount of blog spam has exploded here. My combination of TanTanNoodle's Simple Spam Filter and Automattic's Akismet do as best a job as they can to stop the onslaught, but at this stage I feel as though I'm trying to stop a waterfall by holding out a sheet of newspaper.

Some statistics

  • Since 2008, TanTanNoodle's SimpleSpamFilter reports that it's blocked 6,131,412 comments. That's right, more than 6 million spam comments. As I said on Twitter, this is absurd!

  • Since 2005, Akismet reports that it has blocked 196,192 comments, missed 1,844, and had 22 false positives. The latter I suspect is optimistic, I'm sure plenty more legitimate ones have been lost.

  • WordPress reports 3,336 legitimate blog comments.

That graphs shows why I'm not studying stats

So now I come to the inevitable question... is having comments on my blog worth it?

For the first time, I'm thinking not. With uni and family work consuming more of my time thesedays, I simply couldn't be bothered trawling through what's been caught in the hopes of finding a couple of legitimate comments. I'm tired of having my email inbox flooded with notifications of generic, bogus comments linking to dodgy websites.

Hosting sites with public facing interfaces are also harder to keep secure too, while I'm at it.

So what's the alternative? The more I think about it, the more I realise the alternative already exists, and people are using it. I get more comments from people on Twitter and the like than I ever got on my site here.

I'm also reminded of how blogging used to work, with trackbacks and the like. Before comment systems, if you wanted to comment on someone's post, you'd write a response post on your own blog and link back. Such was the promise of the early "blogosphere", a loose knit federation of writers with their own spaces. A bazaar rather than a cathedral, if you like.

So here we go!

I'm going to trial disabling the comment system on Rubenerd.com, and replacing the comment form with static, HTML links for those who want to post to Delicious, Twitter and so on, along with the permalink (URL) for this page for those who want to respond on their own blogs. Like it used to be :).

If it works for John Gruber and the like, I'm hoping it'll work for me. It'll reduce my workload, the load on my server, and the number of plugins I need to keep updated. We'll see.


What's with all the Zune spam?!

Hide-A-Pod!

Been getting a lot lot LOT of Zune comment spam here lately. Weird thing is, they're posted on entries that have nothing to do with it whatsoever.

If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.

Well gee I'd love to, but they don't sell Zunes in either of the countries I live in, nor are there Best Buys here! I "smile" when my pockets are relieved from not carrying two separate devices for phone calls and listening to music.

The new Zune browser is surprisingly excellent, but not as great as the iPod’s. It operates nicely, but isn’t as quick as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally program on working with the net browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re arranging to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s bigger screen and far better browser might be crucial.

Thanks for the tip, but what does that have to do with Yui wearing socks? Are they just spraying every post they can find with their spam? I was under the impression spammers used keyword searches to attach themselves to posts that are at least vaguely relevant.

This is a very exciting post, I was looking for this knowledge on the Zune. Just so you know I located your webpage when I was browsing for blogs like mine, so please check out my site sometime and leave me a comment to let me know what you think.

I would, if you left a URL! They didn't leave anything. Doesn't that defeat the purpose of having a blog spam comment?

Excellent submit. I learn a very important factor harder upon many different sites every day. It will always be stimulating to see content material off their copy writers and also implement a little at their Zune Marketplace. I’d intend to make usage of some using the articles on my own web site whether anyone don’t thoughts. Natually I’ll provide you with a website link with your internet website. Appreciate your expressing.

That of the comment contain much the t-shirt material right there it is.

Buildings are not very cheap and not everybody is able to buy it zune.

*facepalm*

In Soviet Russia, Zune doesn't buy you

Okay I made that one up.

Are people just trying to increase the occurrence of the word on sites so when people do searches for the device they get more results? Are they just trying to spread the brown sugar around? No wait they come in other colours now, never mind.

By the way as a matter of disclosure, the originating IPs aren't from Microsoft. I wish I knew what they were.


CNET email marketing #fail

CNET

Dear CNET Member: Get ready for this year's big game by creating a new list on CNET, and enter to win a new LED TV in the Samsung Super Bowl Wish List Sweepstakes! [...]

SWEEPSTAKES OPEN TO LEGAL RESIDENTS OF ONE OF THE 50 UNITED STATES OR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AT LEAST 18 YEARS OR AGE OF MAJORITY IN STATE OF RESIDENCE AND OLDER ON DATE OF ENTRY. [...]

Dear CNET, I provided my location in my account profile with you, please don't send me spam that doesn't even relate to me. Sincerely, Ruben in Singapore and Australia.

This sort of thing happens to me all the time, and not just from CNET. How hard would it be to check a user's provided country before sending them offers and competitions they're not eligible for? One or two extra lines of code?


Macho dignity email spam

Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam...

Fornicate like a macho!
Enlarge your male dignity!
[redacted spam link]

Clearly you have a differing view on the subject of dignity than I do, spammer person. Now if you'd excuse me, I'm off to a coffee shop while wearing this shirt.

I didn't say I had any dignity, just that they're idea of it is different to my own. Grilled cheese sandwiches and whatnot.


Market research fail

rubenerd,

As mentioned last week, because you've posted articles, photos or video to NowPublic [I have?], our sister site [redacted], is now personally inviting you to also become an Examiner for the US or Canadian city where you live - chose from 160 - or for one of the two national editions.

(emphasis added)

If this was an autogenerated email, it wouldn't have taken much effort for them to see that I'm clearly not from either place! I suppose it's too much to ask for spam to at least be slightly relevant ;).


Esoteric spam that serves no purpose


Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam...

Spammers often add random sentences to their messages to fool filters, some of which end up being oddly amusing and almost poetic in a bizarre sort of way.

This message was sent to my primary rubenerd.com address and I can't make head nor tales of it:

You said I was no archer, said Robin Hood
In boat or in horsecart

That's all there was. No images, file attachments, links to products for sale or sites serving up malicious code. I thought perhaps the spam filters cleaned it, but if it arrived in my inbox it wasn't considered spam then, right? Perhaps the senders have their server configured to request a reciept which they then use to confirm the email address is legitimate.

In any case, if this is the barrier to entry perhaps I should start writing such messages. Here are some I whipped up while waiting on the phone (and waiting, and waiting) to a medical insurance company.

You said I was no vocalist, said Akiyama Mio
In an embarassing cable tripping disaster

We agreed you weren't as Irish as me, said Neal O'Carrol
Swimming in a grilled cheese sandwich


Cap'n, we're under attack by Twitter bots!

A Twitter retweet spam bot

Two Twitter posts in a row? Sorry, it won't happen again!

There's a new grey area for Twitter accounts. Where as before I'd either see a real person/organisation/whatnot or a spam bot when clearing out my followers list, there are an increasing number of bots that's sole purpose is simply to look for keywords tweeted by people, and either repost them or automatically respond. Both have the consequence of sending me a tweet because they've used my @rubenerd handle, which when done enough times during the course of a day gets old fast.

A retweet from a real person is fantastic, it means people who otherwise wouldn't be following me can see what I'm posting, and it shows people are interested in what I'm saying. When a bot retweets me merely because they're trawling through current tweets searching for keywords though, its somewhat less fantastic. Grilled cheese sandwiches have cheese in them.

I positively loathe these arbitrary lists of the "types of Twitter users" that people seem overly compelled to produce with dull regularlity, but in this case I think it makes sense because we're dealing with a specific phenomena. So far these are the kinds of keywords bots I can identify:

Keyword bots as a service
These include bots that search for specific topics such as a location or a company and retweet them, so people interested in a topic can subscribe and check out who's discussing it. While a great idea in theory, the same results can be achieved by using a dedicated search in clients such as TweetDeck that don't also annoyingly ping the people who's tweets have been reposted.

Keyword bots as marketing
This is spam, plain and simple. Every time I talk about web hosting to another Twitter user, I get a flurry of spam messages from bots that have detected my use of the phrase "web host". These result in a block and a report to @spam.

Keywords bots for... nothing!
These are retweets generated by bots based on the most arbitrary, pointless criteria. This afternoon I've been retweeted and had messages sent to me because bots searching for the phrases "mum", "how about that?", "isn't it" and "wow" picked up tweets of mine. I guess these could be fun for a few people, but as the number of these increase and drown out messages from people who I care about, I'm getting closer to blocking them and reporting them to @spam too.

If you're a Twitter-er-er-er-er, what do you think of these Twitter bot whatsits? Are they harmless and I'm overreacting, or do they annoy you too?