Posts tagged with "rant"


Borrowers don't want me dressing like a nerd!

We're all familiar with dryers that produce a spare sock from a bunch of pairs. I propose this scientifically reproducible phenomena also extends to packing boxes, given yet another maddeningly fruitless search this afternoon.

When we operate a clothes dryer, we place our perfectly matching pairs of socks into it, then let it spin until the moisture has been adequately expelled for the subsequent comfortable wearing of said devices. There'd be little point throwing in a spare sock, because we can't just wear one. Yet, whenever this time honoured tradition of the suburbanite is performed (a rite of passage if you will), we are left pondering why a spare sock appeared, or another sock went missing.

House moving is no different. Over the course of my sister's and my life, we've lived in 14 houses in 6 cities in 3 countries (if I count Adelaide when I was in student housing and living with friends). During each of these moves, we've had our entire lives thrown into boxes, taped up and shipped somewhere.

Without fail, we lose things to breakage, or other things simply vanish without a trace! With this latest move to Sydney I can add four more things to the list:

  • my Yuki mug (from the Haruhi Suzumiya series)
  • my Gundam ZAFT uniform
  • my Star Trek DS9/VOY science uniform (still got the badge!)
  • and my Ouran High Hosts Club blazer.

The problem with losing things from moves (other than the actual losing) is that you never have closure. You're never sure whether the items are in a box that never got unpacked, or whether it fell off a truck. It could be under your nose the entire time and you don't know it, or someone else is using your stuff. It doesn't matter if the boxes are numbered and catalogued, or who you ship with, or whether it's a blue moon, it doesn't seem to make any difference.

A Buddhist would tell me that it's my attachment to material possessions that's the problem, and that it's the ultimate symbol of a first world problem, but I really liked that stuff, and I could have really used those clothes for SMASH! on Saturday. Bummed out beyond all belief.

Guess it's just time to start from scratch again... though too late for the one event of the year when it mattered. F*ck.


Cause this is my United States of Whatever

Now that Australia is the 51st state of the United States, I'll be expecting my American Amazon account to become active any day now. I'm proud of this post!

The Obama

Firstly, after many aborted attempts to visit us in the land where things are upside down, where kangaroos are the primary form of transport, and where steep Alpine slopes take tourists down a breathtaking ski run to a Germanic cabin where hot chocolate is served, President Barack Obama visited Australia. To minimise the disruption for commuters, he eschewed (gesundheit) the more populated areas in favour of vising the the new regional Amercian capital of Australia in Darwin, and the former one in Canberra.

Speaking in the newly constructed Capitol building in Darwin where a large military base is being assembled, details of the scope of the new occupation force began to emerge. From SBS World News:

Referring to joint plans to base 250 US marines in the Top End next year, rising to 2500 in five years, he said Darwin would write the next chapter in the "proud history of our alliance".

Marines were chosen over other military personnel for the occupation force, to prevent waves of Australian refugees from fleeing on small boats to Indonesia.

The PRC

Confusingly, while the United States takes on the roll of administering Australia from the largely ineffective minority government led by Alan Jones, China remains the primary supplier of Australian economic aid which has helped former politicians including John Howard and Peter Costello to claim successes for their policies.

Speaking at a conference in Bali to escape the heat in the ACT, Julia Gillard assured the Chinese government that the new administrators weren't a threat to Chinese hegemony, and downplayed the words of the new President. From SBS World News:

"We have in Australia made an announcement with president Obama about the rotational deployment of marines into the Northern Territory for the purpose of exercising [because they're were getting fat], that having the US engaged in our region is a force for stability, that having those marines training alongside the ADF in Australia enables us to have a strengthened capacity to respond to regional contingencies including things like natural disasters.

While also taking a swipe at the Singapore government's treatment of Australia as a dumping ground for helicopters, Gillard took the opportunity to provide some much needed perspective.

[..] during the last Australian summer of flood and bushfires, Singapore offered use of helicopters to assist in relief operations. That was possible because Singapore has military helicopters on Australian territory for long-term training.

The Convenience

Meanwhile, back on Australian American soil, ZDNet Australia reported on how the annexation of Australia would have long term security benefits.

As part of US President Barack Obama's visit to Australia, a raft of new accords have been agreed upon to strengthen the national security of the two nations, [..]

Not "theoretically" strengthen, or "allegedly", but straight out strengthen. Certainty is critical in these matters.

[..] including a memorandum that will see US law enforcement agencies score access to the names, aliases, DNA and fingerprint information of suspected criminals and terrorists.

Following in the footsteps of draconian global copyright treaties that would see suspected file sharers have their internet revoked, in this scenario merely being a suspect without conviction would be enough to have your personal details sent to the United States.

While drastically securing everything because they say so, this would allow travelers who have never even been to the US to have their personal information transported there and stored. From a convenience perspective, its a win-win. I'm sure Bruce Schneier would wholeheartedly agree, if someone stuck a gun in his back, or something.

Conclusions

Now that the United States is administering Australia, I am looking foward to having their laws implemented here, which will facilitate me opening Amazon and Apple Store accounts without the messy overseas cards I'm currently using.


NSW post-leadership benefits... wait, what?

Perfect weather for the day!

I was going to save this for tomorrow, but a series of tweets from the illustrious @talkingduck (private account) led me to finish this off and post it today. If you thought I was unfairly ragging on Victoria today, take a gander at this!

The political compass said I was a Liberal Libertarian

In what other field of work do you get benefits and perks even after you leave the organisation?

The news spreading around The Twitters this morning was that former New South Wales state premier Kristina Keneally had her post-leadership travel entitlements revoked by current premier Barry O'Farrell. These include the use of state cars (heaven forfend they take public transport like the rest of us!) and access to the series of catapults on the border that keeps those pesky Victorians from fining us. Presumably.

On the surface, I didn't have a problem with this. My "liberal" side (in the American sense) understands some government spending is necessary to compensate for market failures (economic terminology meaning services the private sector can't or won't provide), but my "libertarian" side loathes government spending that doesn't provide anything useful. Like... state government in a country with less people than many cities! Like this one:

Yes, I was able to work in another press image for the upcoming Guilty Crown anime I blogged about earlier today, in an post that has nothing to do with it whatsoever. Not only that, I did it while enduring an (albeit gradually improving) headache. Is that skill, or what!? Don't answer that.

But I digress

Shortly after posting my frustrations on Twitter, @joshgnosis pointed out to me part of the reason people are up in arms is that O'Farrell only penalised Keneally, not anyone else. While I agree this is dodgy, my point is why should anyone voted out of office still be entitled to our funds to use as they see fit?

What I found particularly egregious is the justification that state cars are used to ferry former politicians to charity events. While this may true, imagine if theses politicians donated the funds to maintain this fleet of state cars, and drove there themselves or took a taxi? The rest of us don't take what are essentially taxpayer funded limousines to such events, why should they?

I should contact the companies I worked for back in home and ask them when I can be expecting my return tickets to Singapore! I mean, I don't work for them anymore, but I'm entitled to them, right?

(Random photo of Sydney taken by... me! View on Flickr)


Online universities won't be cheaper

Icon from the KDE Oxygen projectThe Atlantic, via Slashdot:

If tuition costs slow their fierce rise, it will be because we figure out how to take some elements of college and put them online. How's that going? Slowly. Very slowly.

Leaving aside their unfortunate use of the word root, such stories that serve to promote the idea of online education always miss one critical point. Particularly for IT, what you learn is secondary to the connections in academia and industry you make.

The author also assumes that tuition fees will be more affordable if classes are taught online, presumably because cost savings will be passed on. Methinks they're being a little naïve.


Ruben's Australian immigration rant of 2011

After hearing of yet another struggle against The System from a friend, I felt compelled to finally finish this post and publish it.

It's not easy being green

Before I launch into what is no doubt going to be a rant to end all rants here at Rubénerd.com, I would like to play devil's advocate for a moment and acknowledge the incredible pressure politicians in this country are under. After breaking so many promises and continuing to stun us with incompetence, corruption, short-sightedness and poor behaviour unbecoming of someone holding public office, it's completely understandable why they would resort to distracting the public with hot button topics.

Immigration is a perfect topic for such a distraction, and immigrants are seen as the perfect patsies. No matter that Australia is the destination for less than 1% of the world's immigrants, politicians and talk show pundits can loudly proclaim we're being swamped, and our tax dollars wasted. Politicians on one side can secure the progressive vote by pretending to be more compassionate without doing anything, and the other side can pander to insular xenophobics who regard Alan Jones and The Australian newspaper as news and who consider themselves worldly because they've seen Sydney and Melbourne.

In other words, as long as you're not caught in their net, everybody wins.

Unlike so many pundits and journalists, I won't pretend to understand the hardship or heartache that immigrants forced to leave their homelands to come here experience, but what I can discuss are two specific examples.

Someone coming back

In 1996 my family moved to Singapore to support my father's job. We were only supposed to be stationed there for two years, but we enjoyed it so much and my mother's medical care was so far ahead of anything available in Australia that we decided to stay. We only just moved back in 2010, and I have every intention of moving back there one day. It's home, my sister and I are thoroughly third culture kids, and I'm not ashamed to admit this.

In the time we lived there, we travelled through much of South East Asia and even spent a brief time living in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Despite not being citizens, when we arrived back from each trip immigration officials treated us with respect, humility and a smile. Green card applications were never a problem, and the few times there were issues with other immigration matters they were surprisingly understanding and flexible.

Unfortunately, this only made the shock that was Australian immigration that much more acute. Perhaps it was because we "ex-patriated", but in the times we travelled back to our home country we were hassled every time. A few examples: we'd always be rudely asked if we knew where the address we'd listed on our immigration cards were, what we'd had being doing overseas, and invariably we'd almost always be chosen for "random" bag checks.

When I came back to Australia to study at university, it only got worse. Government agencies wanted in writing that I had "severed all ties" and "rescinded my allegiances" to "foreign powers", as if I had spent my entire time in Singapore leaking intelligence from ASIO. There's more I could say here, but I won't!

None of these situations are unusual, there are thousands of Australians who for their own personal reasons decide to live overseas. I have no evidence that we're flagged in a federal database as being deserters, but one can understand my suspicions!

People wanting to stay

The problems I mentioned above were whinging, first world issues by a rich white guy, and I would be willing to tolerate them a thousand times over if it meant friends I knew didn't have to go through the following nonsense.

At the Australian International School in Singapore, we were often visited by people representing Australian universities, and inevitably even most of the non-Aussies there decided to study at them.

Despite completing the New South Wales HSC with Advanced and/or Extension English as some of their subjects, friends of mine couldn't study in Australia without completing IELTS, a test of English proficiency. Appreciate for a second how absurd that was: they studied Advanced English at an Australian school, passed with higher marks than most of the Australians, and they still had to perform a test, simply because they were from countries where English isn't an official language. Its almost as absurd, as the infighting between Australian states and the federal government. Yes, a country with less people than many cities has states. Why aren't people getting angry at the tax dollars being spent on another layer of pointless government instead of people "arriving in boats"? But I digress.

Lately I've been made aware of another friend's struggles with Australian immigration, and this time it makes even less sense. Despite completing a degree at an Australian university and receiving one of the highest marks of their graduating cohort, they had to take an IELTS test before their application for a worker's permit can even be considered. To add insult to injury, because they're not an engineer or a scientist, finding "qualifying" work just to stay in the country is a struggle.

The problem is only compounded by requests for information that aren't stated in the forms, and that if are not provided cause suspension of consideration. Government bureaucracy and red tape have so thoroughly co-opted common sense that some folk I talk to even thing this is reasonable. Seriously!

Common sense isn't

As I argued at great length about last year, Australia is competing in an increasingly networked world where workers are more mobile than ever before. Many of the world's most talented and intelligent people no longer feel an obligation to an arbitrary state, and choose to work and live in places that inspire them, that they can afford, and that value them and their skills.

Fortunately for the government, Australia has something going for it. Universities here are increasingly some of the top tertiary study destinations for Asian students; drive down any street in Canberra with its block after block of student housing and you rapidly realise just how valuable a part of the economy they are.

What boggles my mind is that they're willing to collect tax on the exorbitant fees levied against international students, but they don't think beyond that. If I were a government wanting to compete globally, I would want to do anything and everything in my power to retain these talented and intelligent people, to get them a job here or to give them a reasonable chance to look for one, and eventually have them pay taxes here.

Irrelevancy

Inevitably though, immigration policy is becoming increasingly irrelevant anyway. The quaint notions of nation states forged as a way to allow kings and nobility to control the peasant classes are being superseded not necessarily by grand organisations such as the UN, but by global communications such as The Internets, multi national corporations, and a mobile class who live and work where they want, not just where they happened to be born. Treat these people badly, and they'll leave.

I suppose governments figure the nation state still has enough steam in it to exploit for a while longer, and this mobile class is too small to make a difference. I wish them luck as they look backwards or up their collective behinds, but they won't be able to hold back the tide indefinitely. I just wish in the meantime they would adopt some Common Sense, though I'm not holding my breath.

In the meantime, to all the politicians, bureaucrats, officials and pundits in Australia, I salute thee with my middle finder for being so superlatively out of touch I'd be surprised if you had fingers at all.


+61 3 9945 7300 is Insurance Line telemarketers

All you need to know. Or you can read my vented frustrations!

Comprehensive broken keyboard insurance!

This Victorian number (03 9945 7300 in local Aussie number reference) has called my handphone once or twice a day for just shy of a month now. Granted they're more considerate than other marketers, at least they don't call during dinner or in the wee hours of the morning like I used to get on my old Aussie number. It's still unwanted though!

Doing a quick Google search returned these results. When I read the number is allegedly from telemarketers working for Insurance Line, I wasn't surprised. The bane of morning TV with their painfully scripted "infomercials" I've had to sit through while in offices or cafés that play TV, Insurance Line are the exploiters of more individual fears that I've ever seen from an insurer. Cancer insurance? *contains rage*.

Needless to say, their insidious telemarketing will insure (see what I did there?) that even if I were considering them for insurance before, I wouldn't now. I suppose companies that indulge in this behaviour can justify it financially otherwise they wouldn't do it, but next time they call, I'll answer in silence. If they want to call me, they can waste their money.

The Trace is The Race

Aside from the frustration this number is causing me, what I'd like to know is how they got my number in the first place. The only organisations I [knowingly] gave my number to are DBS/POSB, NUS and SingTel in Singapore, and Westpac and UTS in Australia. I've never entered "contests" (aka: marketing gathering exercises) nor have I ever called a "premium" number with it. I'm on the Australian Do Not Call list. The Bird is The Word.

I tell you what, I love my iTelephone, but a webOS or Android phone with third party software to block certain numbers sounds awfully appealing right now. Optus won't let me block numbers.


Governments buying stock doesn't count!

Icon from the Tango Desktop project

But without more consumer spending, businesses won’t spend more. A robust economy can’t be built on inventory replacements. ~ Robert Reich

Exactly. This is another reason why my American friends should be viewing the reports that Chrysler "paid off" their governments debts six years early with nothing but scepticism. Paying off debts due to demand from governments refreshing their car fleets rather than from private consumers is tantamount to smoke and mirrors.

I'd also argue if the US government were serious about creating jobs and helping the environment they'd put people to work improving public transport instead, but that's just my no good greenie side asserting itself again.


Victorinox Altmont 2.0 laptop baggyness

So I want to buy a bag. Who'd have thought it would turn into such a kerfuffle!?

Crumplerness

For the last ten years, I've been a loyal Crumpler customer. I bought my SLR camera bag, shoulder laptop bag and backpack from their store in Wheelock Place. They're comfortable, come in bright colours and are more interesting than your run of the mill luggage. In the years I've had them, they've held up really well.

The problem is, while they look really cool and are super comfortable, they're not the most efficiently designed. Even when empty they tend to be bulky and large, and when they're full they expand into awkward shapes that are hard to travel with on trains, under the seat in front of me on aeroplanes and buses, through subspace with Ramona, and on Star Trek transporter pads. Starfleet have had it with my luggage shenanigans.

It even has "2.0" in the name ^_^

After a particularly awkward train ride with my backpack last week, I decided enough was enough and that I should start shopping for alternatives. A friend of mine in Boston recommended this series of bags, and this one looked perfect!

Laptop Backpack - Altmont™ 2.0 - Victorinox AG
15.4" / 39 cm Padded Computer Pack

Perfect for everyday commuting, this durable, spacious pack has ideal capacity for carrying a laptop and everyday gear.

It ticks all the boxes! Unlike my Crumpler bag which has a supremely awkward inner section for the laptop, it has two entirely separate compartments and is lighter and smaller. Like my Crumpler bag it also comes in red, a far nicer colour than black. Cue the "but black isn't a colour!" folks ;).

I've been a Victorinox fan ever since I got my first Swiss Army Knife when I was 12. We were on holiday in Germany at the time, and on a whim we all thought it'd be amusing if we bought it from Switzerland, so we made a half hour detour! :D

My old man has had Victorinox laptop and suit bags that have been around the world more times than he can count, and have survived extremely well. They're not as visually striking as Crumpler bags, but they're smaller for the same volume of space and are extremely durable. My primary bag tends to be my best friend, we go everywhere together, so this is important!

Can I find someone to sell me one?

So this is where the fun begins!

  • I called every single Australian reseller listed on the Victorinox website, not one had them, and half didn't even know what I was talking about.

  • Amazon.com and several of their affiliates have them, but refuse to ship to me. I suppose I'm from overseas and could stuff that bag with explosives or something.

  • IRV's Luggage and LuggageOnline sell them, but unfortunately they use the exorbitant iShopUSA for international shipping. $94, and its not even priority, are they high?

  • Three other international sellers had more reasonable prices, but only had stock of the black one, despite clearly stating they had stock of the red on their site(s).

  • No a single hit on eBay, GumTree or Craigslist.

I've lodged an enquiry with the Luggage Professionals Victorinox resellers here in Sydney, and a couple of other international sellers for shipping quotes.

I'm now at the stage where I could easily enough just buy another bag, but its the principle of the thing that irks me. Its 2011, and I can't buy a bag? I am making a mission out of this!


A user interface progress rant

Sounds like a jolly good idea!

Product of the 80s!

Having been at uni on and off for several years now and having seen the work my fellow students produce, there's no doubt in my mind there are some extrodinarily talented developers in my generation. The problem is, talented developers aren't always the best UI designers, and I'm not just talking about all the technically brilliant but visually ugly projects on Github or SourceForge, I'm talking about basic UI principles.

In our latest project, we were tasked with solving a problem that involves some fairly intensive backend processing. I don't know why that sounds so wrong. As such, the user is instructed to wait for a period of time while the work is completed, then the results are displayed.

Being the very technical and logical folk they are, the two people in my group in charged with the frontend proceeded to write the interface for the user, following the instructions for the assignments to a T. Mmm, tea. They dutifully created a dialogue box informing users they would have to wait, then sent the stuff off for processing.

So what?

Seems simple enough, but the approach is fundamentally flawed, and you probably already know why yourself!

One of the most fundamental principles of good UI design is users should always, always be given a visual indication that activity is happening. Not sometimes, or most of the time, or only if there's activity on the network or hard drive or whatever, always. Without exception.

The problem is, for GUI applications that present a simple "Working..." dialog box, there's no way for the user to know if the application is really working, or if its stalled or crashed. People get frustrated, and quit applications that look like they've crashed, which means obviously they can't complete their tasks. In simpler or more poorly written applications without fault tolerance, suddenly quitting can lead to data loss or corruption, which means the user is even worse off!

Professional users can run packet sniffers and process inspectors to check the status of seemingly crashed GUI applications, but regular users can't be expected to do this, and those who think they can be are either deluded or the stuff they're smoking is more powerful than they realise!

Icon from the Tango Desktop Project

Devil's Advocate General

The problem is, for developers of CUI applications its fairly easy to show the status of a process: you typically check for a -v option, then send what you're doing to standard output and be done with it! Before we used Eudora at home our email program was called Cooee, which kinda looks like CUI. But I digress.

With GUI applications there's more fuzzy logic involved; it's up to you to interpret what is pertinent information to the user, translate it into English and give a visual indication. It could be "connecting to network" or "38% processed" or an animation that plays for as long as data is being transmitted or processed. In any event, if these messages are interrupted or paused for an unreasonable length of time, users can be more confident that applications have crashed or not, and can take corrective action.

This rant was limited to GUI applications on the desktop, but the same arguments could be made about the latest generation of AJAX applications online that are so opaque and slow its downright maddening. For online software that is so dependent on network connectivity, I would argue effective visual indications of activity are even more important! But that's for another post ;).

Picture by 白菜/mute on Pixiv. Screenshot taken from an early prototype of our project, unfortunately!


[Possibly NSFW] Commons image of the day

Anyone else notice Wikimedia Common's Picture of the day today?

No Ruben, do tell!

File:On the edge - free world version.jpg

English: Drawing of a fictional landscape with a figure in manga/anime style. The title of this image is: On the Edge. Programs used: GIMP, Inkscape, Blender. ~ Niabot

Okay then, so what?

Aside from being a really colourful and creative image in its own right (love the light coming in through the trees onto the Shinto gate), I applaud the editors at Wikimedia for not only allowing material like this, but gracing their homepage with it for a day and tagging it as "a featured picture on Wikimedia Commons" and "This image has been assessed using the Quality image guidelines and is considered a Quality image". Seriously!

I think it speaks volumes about our culture that images like this warrent a NSFW warning, but gory violence where people are graphically maimed or killed is perfectly acceptable, or at the very least is more leniently censored. I have my suspicions as to why that is, but at the risk of getting into further trouble, I won't discuss it here!

This was the first -- and will be the last -- NSFW image on Rubénerd.com. I hope I didn't offend, or at the very least scar you for life!

UPDATE: It seems the image isn't the picture of the day anymore, in the time I wrote this it changed to something completely different. There's a Monty Python reference in there somewhere. Anyway, dang timezones, I keep forgetting their servers are in the US! There's probably an archive of previous pictures of the day somewhere on their site.